243 lines
7.2 KiB
Markdown
243 lines
7.2 KiB
Markdown
# NT8 Institutional SDK - Development Workflow
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
This document outlines the development workflow for the NT8 Institutional SDK, following the Archon workflow principles even in the absence of the Archon MCP server.
|
|
|
|
## Archon Workflow Principles
|
|
|
|
The development process follows these core principles adapted from the Archon workflow:
|
|
|
|
### 1. Check Current Task
|
|
Before beginning any work, clearly define what needs to be accomplished:
|
|
- Review requirements and specifications
|
|
- Understand success criteria
|
|
- Identify dependencies and blockers
|
|
|
|
### 2. Research for Task
|
|
Conduct thorough research before implementation:
|
|
- Review existing code and documentation
|
|
- Understand best practices and patterns
|
|
- Identify potential challenges and solutions
|
|
|
|
### 3. Implement the Task
|
|
Execute the implementation with focus and precision:
|
|
- Follow established patterns and conventions
|
|
- Write clean, maintainable code
|
|
- Include comprehensive error handling
|
|
- Add structured logging for observability
|
|
|
|
### 4. Update Task Status
|
|
Track progress and document completion:
|
|
- Mark tasks as completed in the todo list
|
|
- Document any issues or deviations
|
|
- Note lessons learned for future reference
|
|
|
|
### 5. Get Next Task
|
|
Move systematically through the implementation:
|
|
- Prioritize tasks based on dependencies
|
|
- Focus on one task at a time
|
|
- Ensure quality before moving forward
|
|
|
|
## Development Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Planning and Design
|
|
1. Review specifications and requirements
|
|
2. Create architecture diagrams and documentation
|
|
3. Identify core components and their interactions
|
|
4. Plan implementation approach and timeline
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Environment Setup
|
|
1. Create project structure and configuration files
|
|
2. Set up build and test infrastructure
|
|
3. Configure CI/CD pipeline
|
|
4. Verify development environment
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Core Implementation
|
|
1. Implement core interfaces and models
|
|
2. Develop risk management components
|
|
3. Create position sizing algorithms
|
|
4. Build supporting utilities and helpers
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Testing and Validation
|
|
1. Create comprehensive unit tests
|
|
2. Implement integration tests
|
|
3. Run validation scripts
|
|
4. Verify all success criteria
|
|
|
|
### Phase 5: Documentation and Delivery
|
|
1. Create developer documentation
|
|
2. Write user guides and examples
|
|
3. Prepare release notes
|
|
4. Conduct final validation
|
|
|
|
## Code Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### 1. Code Structure
|
|
- Follow established naming conventions
|
|
- Use consistent formatting and style
|
|
- Organize code into logical modules
|
|
- Maintain clear separation of concerns
|
|
|
|
### 2. Error Handling
|
|
- Validate all inputs and parameters
|
|
- Provide meaningful error messages
|
|
- Handle exceptions gracefully
|
|
- Log errors for debugging
|
|
|
|
### 3. Testing
|
|
- Write unit tests for all public methods
|
|
- Include edge case testing
|
|
- Validate error conditions
|
|
- Maintain >90% code coverage
|
|
|
|
### 4. Documentation
|
|
- Include XML documentation for all public APIs
|
|
- Add inline comments for complex logic
|
|
- Document configuration options
|
|
- Provide usage examples
|
|
|
|
## Git Workflow
|
|
|
|
### Branching Strategy
|
|
- Use feature branches for all development
|
|
- Create branches from main for new features
|
|
- Keep feature branches short-lived
|
|
- Merge to main after review and testing
|
|
|
|
### Commit Guidelines
|
|
- Write clear, descriptive commit messages
|
|
- Make small, focused commits
|
|
- Reference issues or tasks in commit messages
|
|
- Squash related commits before merging
|
|
|
|
### Pull Request Process
|
|
- Create PRs for all feature work
|
|
- Include description of changes and testing
|
|
- Request review from team members
|
|
- Address feedback before merging
|
|
|
|
## Development Environment
|
|
|
|
### Required Tools
|
|
- .NET 6.0 SDK
|
|
- Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio
|
|
- Git for version control
|
|
- Docker Desktop (recommended)
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Extensions
|
|
- C# for Visual Studio Code
|
|
- EditorConfig for VS Code
|
|
- GitLens for enhanced Git experience
|
|
- Docker extension for container management
|
|
|
|
## Build and Test Process
|
|
|
|
### Local Development
|
|
1. Restore NuGet packages: `dotnet restore`
|
|
2. Build solution: `dotnet build`
|
|
3. Run tests: `dotnet test`
|
|
4. Run specific test categories if needed
|
|
|
|
### Continuous Integration
|
|
- Automated builds on every commit
|
|
- Run full test suite on each build
|
|
- Generate code coverage reports
|
|
- Deploy to test environments
|
|
|
|
## Debugging and Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
### Common Issues
|
|
1. **Build Failures**
|
|
- Check for missing NuGet packages
|
|
- Verify .NET SDK version
|
|
- Ensure all projects reference correct frameworks
|
|
|
|
2. **Test Failures**
|
|
- Review test output for specific errors
|
|
- Check test data and setup
|
|
- Verify mock configurations
|
|
|
|
3. **Runtime Errors**
|
|
- Check logs for error details
|
|
- Validate configuration settings
|
|
- Review dependency injection setup
|
|
|
|
### Debugging Tools
|
|
- Visual Studio debugger
|
|
- Console logging
|
|
- Structured logging with correlation IDs
|
|
- Performance profiling tools
|
|
|
|
## Release Process
|
|
|
|
### Versioning
|
|
- Follow semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH)
|
|
- Increment version in Directory.Build.props
|
|
- Update release notes with changes
|
|
- Tag releases in Git
|
|
|
|
### Deployment
|
|
- Create NuGet packages for SDK components
|
|
- Publish to internal package repository
|
|
- Update documentation with release notes
|
|
- Notify stakeholders of new releases
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### 1. Code Reviews
|
|
- Review all code before merging
|
|
- Focus on correctness, maintainability, and performance
|
|
- Provide constructive feedback
|
|
- Ensure adherence to coding standards
|
|
|
|
### 2. Performance Considerations
|
|
- Minimize allocations in hot paths
|
|
- Use efficient data structures
|
|
- Cache expensive operations
|
|
- Profile performance regularly
|
|
|
|
### 3. Security
|
|
- Validate all inputs
|
|
- Sanitize user data
|
|
- Protect sensitive configuration
|
|
- Follow secure coding practices
|
|
|
|
### 4. Maintainability
|
|
- Write self-documenting code
|
|
- Use meaningful variable and method names
|
|
- Keep methods small and focused
|
|
- Refactor regularly to improve design
|
|
|
|
## Task Management Without Archon
|
|
|
|
Since we're not using the Archon MCP server, we'll manage tasks using:
|
|
1. **Todo Lists**: Track progress using markdown checklists
|
|
2. **Documentation**: Maintain detailed records of implementation decisions
|
|
3. **Git**: Use commits and branches to track work progress
|
|
4. **Issue Tracking**: Use GitHub Issues or similar for task management
|
|
|
|
### Task Status Tracking
|
|
- **Todo**: Task identified but not started
|
|
- **In Progress**: Actively working on task
|
|
- **Review**: Task completed, awaiting validation
|
|
- **Done**: Task validated and completed
|
|
|
|
## Communication and Collaboration
|
|
|
|
### Team Coordination
|
|
- Hold regular standups to discuss progress
|
|
- Use collaborative tools for communication
|
|
- Document architectural decisions
|
|
- Share knowledge and best practices
|
|
|
|
### Knowledge Sharing
|
|
- Conduct code walkthroughs for complex features
|
|
- Create technical documentation
|
|
- Share lessons learned from issues
|
|
- Mentor new team members
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
This development workflow ensures consistent, high-quality implementation of the NT8 Institutional SDK. By following these principles and practices, we can deliver a robust, maintainable, and scalable trading platform that meets institutional requirements for risk management and performance.
|
|
|
|
The workflow emphasizes systematic progress, quality assurance, and continuous improvement. Each task should be approached with thorough research, careful implementation, and comprehensive validation to ensure the highest quality outcome. |