642 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
642 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
# Implementation Validation Plan
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document outlines a comprehensive validation plan to ensure the Order Management System (OMS) implementation meets all functional and non-functional requirements through systematic testing with realistic scenarios.
|
|
|
|
## Validation Objectives
|
|
|
|
### Functional Validation
|
|
1. **Order Submission**: Verify all order types can be submitted correctly
|
|
2. **Risk Management**: Ensure risk controls are properly enforced
|
|
3. **Position Sizing**: Validate position sizing calculations
|
|
4. **Algorithmic Execution**: Confirm TWAP, VWAP, and Iceberg algorithms work as expected
|
|
5. **Order Routing**: Verify smart order routing logic
|
|
6. **Rate Limiting**: Confirm rate limits are properly enforced
|
|
7. **Value Limits**: Ensure value limits are properly enforced
|
|
8. **Circuit Breaking**: Validate circuit breaker functionality
|
|
|
|
### Non-Functional Validation
|
|
1. **Performance**: Verify system performance under load
|
|
2. **Scalability**: Confirm system scales appropriately
|
|
3. **Reliability**: Ensure system is resilient to failures
|
|
4. **Security**: Validate system security measures
|
|
5. **Usability**: Confirm system is usable and intuitive
|
|
|
|
## Test Environment
|
|
|
|
### Infrastructure
|
|
- **Development Environment**: Local development machines
|
|
- **Test Environment**: Dedicated test servers
|
|
- **Staging Environment**: Pre-production environment mirroring production
|
|
- **Production Environment**: Live trading environment
|
|
|
|
### Tools
|
|
- **Test Framework**: xUnit.net
|
|
- **Mocking Framework**: Moq
|
|
- **Performance Testing**: Apache JMeter, LoadRunner
|
|
- **Monitoring**: Prometheus, Grafana
|
|
- **Logging**: ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana)
|
|
|
|
## Validation Scenarios
|
|
|
|
### 1. Basic Order Management Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 1.1: Market Order Submission
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Market Order Submission
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to submit market orders
|
|
So that I can enter positions quickly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid market buy order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And I have no existing positions in ES
|
|
When I submit a market buy order for 1 ES contract
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should be filled at market price
|
|
And my position should show 1 long contract
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid market sell order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And I have 1 existing long position in ES
|
|
When I submit a market sell order for 1 ES contract
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should be filled at market price
|
|
And my position should show 0 contracts
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit market order with insufficient funds
|
|
Given I have a trading account with $0
|
|
When I submit a market buy order for 1 ES contract
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And I should receive an "insufficient funds" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit market order for invalid symbol
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account
|
|
When I submit a market buy order for invalid symbol "XYZ"
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And I should receive an "invalid symbol" error
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 1.2: Limit Order Submission
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Limit Order Submission
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to submit limit orders
|
|
So that I can control my entry price
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid limit buy order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And the current market price for ES is 4200
|
|
When I submit a limit buy order for 1 ES contract at 4195
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should remain open until filled or cancelled
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid limit sell order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with 1 long position in ES
|
|
And the current market price for ES is 4200
|
|
When I submit a limit sell order for 1 ES contract at 4205
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should remain open until filled or cancelled
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit limit order with invalid price
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account
|
|
When I submit a limit buy order for 1 ES contract at -100
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And I should receive an "invalid price" error
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 1.3: Stop Order Submission
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Stop Order Submission
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to submit stop orders
|
|
So that I can protect my positions
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid stop market order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with 1 long position in ES at 4200
|
|
And the current market price for ES is 4205
|
|
When I submit a stop market sell order for 1 ES contract at 4195
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should trigger when price reaches 4195
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Submit valid stop limit order
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with 1 long position in ES at 4200
|
|
And the current market price for ES is 4205
|
|
When I submit a stop limit sell order for 1 ES contract at stop 4195 limit 4190
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the order should trigger when price reaches 4195
|
|
And the order should fill at 4190 or better
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. Risk Management Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 2.1: Daily Loss Limit Enforcement
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Daily Loss Limit Enforcement
|
|
As a risk manager
|
|
I want to enforce daily loss limits
|
|
So that traders cannot exceed acceptable loss thresholds
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader exceeds daily loss limit
|
|
Given a trader has incurred $900 in losses today
|
|
And the daily loss limit is $1000
|
|
When the trader submits an order that would incur an additional $200 loss
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "daily loss limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader approaches daily loss limit
|
|
Given a trader has incurred $950 in losses today
|
|
And the daily loss limit is $1000
|
|
When the trader submits an order that would incur an additional $75 loss
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "approaching daily loss limit" warning
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 2.2: Position Limit Enforcement
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Position Limit Enforcement
|
|
As a risk manager
|
|
I want to enforce position limits
|
|
So that traders cannot accumulate excessive positions
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader exceeds position limit
|
|
Given a trader has 4 open positions
|
|
And the maximum open positions limit is 5
|
|
When the trader submits an order that would create a 6th position
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "position limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader closes position to stay within limit
|
|
Given a trader has 5 open positions
|
|
And the maximum open positions limit is 5
|
|
When the trader submits an order to close one position
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
And the trader should be able to submit new positions afterward
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Position Sizing Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 3.1: Fixed Contracts Sizing
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Fixed Contracts Position Sizing
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to use fixed contracts sizing
|
|
So that I can control my position size precisely
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Calculate fixed contracts position
|
|
Given a trader uses fixed contracts sizing with 3 contracts
|
|
When the trader submits a buy order for ES
|
|
Then the position size should be exactly 3 contracts
|
|
Regardless of account size or market conditions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 3.2: Fixed Dollar Risk Sizing
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Fixed Dollar Risk Position Sizing
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to use fixed dollar risk sizing
|
|
So that I can maintain consistent risk per trade
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Calculate fixed dollar risk position
|
|
Given a trader uses fixed dollar risk sizing with $200 risk per trade
|
|
And ES has a tick value of $12.50
|
|
And the trader's stop is 10 ticks away
|
|
When the trader submits a buy order for ES
|
|
Then the position size should be 2 contracts
|
|
Because $200 / (10 ticks * $12.50) = 2 contracts
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 4. Algorithmic Execution Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 4.1: TWAP Algorithm Execution
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: TWAP Algorithm Execution
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to execute orders using TWAP algorithm
|
|
So that I can minimize market impact
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Execute TWAP order successfully
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And I want to buy 100 ES contracts over 30 minutes
|
|
When I submit a TWAP order with 1-minute intervals
|
|
Then the system should place 30 orders of approximately 3-4 contracts each
|
|
And each order should be spaced 1 minute apart
|
|
And the total execution should complete within 30 minutes
|
|
|
|
Scenario: TWAP order cancellation
|
|
Given I have submitted a TWAP order for 100 ES contracts
|
|
And 50 contracts have been executed
|
|
When I cancel the TWAP order
|
|
Then the remaining 50 contracts should not be executed
|
|
And any active orders should be cancelled
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 4.2: VWAP Algorithm Execution
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: VWAP Algorithm Execution
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to execute orders using VWAP algorithm
|
|
So that I can participate in market volume
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Execute VWAP order successfully
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And I want to buy 100 ES contracts over 30 minutes
|
|
When I submit a VWAP order with 10% participation rate
|
|
Then the system should place orders proportional to market volume
|
|
And the average execution price should be close to VWAP
|
|
And the total execution should complete within 30 minutes
|
|
|
|
Scenario: VWAP order with volume prediction
|
|
Given I have submitted a VWAP order with volume prediction enabled
|
|
When market volume is higher than average
|
|
Then the system should increase order size proportionally
|
|
And when market volume is lower than average
|
|
Then the system should decrease order size proportionally
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 4.3: Iceberg Order Execution
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Iceberg Order Execution
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want to execute orders using Iceberg algorithm
|
|
So that I can hide large order sizes
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Execute Iceberg order successfully
|
|
Given I have a valid trading account with $100,000
|
|
And I want to buy 100 ES contracts with visible quantity of 10
|
|
When I submit an Iceberg order
|
|
Then the system should display only 10 contracts at a time
|
|
And as each displayed portion is filled, a new portion should be displayed
|
|
Until all 100 contracts are executed
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Iceberg order cancellation
|
|
Given I have submitted an Iceberg order for 100 ES contracts
|
|
And 50 contracts have been executed
|
|
When I cancel the Iceberg order
|
|
Then the remaining visible quantity should be cancelled
|
|
And no new portions should be displayed
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 5. Order Routing Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 5.1: Smart Order Routing
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Smart Order Routing
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want my orders routed intelligently
|
|
So that I get the best execution
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Route order to best venue
|
|
Given multiple execution venues are available
|
|
And venue A has lower costs but slower execution
|
|
And venue B has higher costs but faster execution
|
|
When I submit an order with cost priority
|
|
Then the order should be routed to venue A
|
|
And when I submit an order with speed priority
|
|
Then the order should be routed to venue B
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Route order based on venue performance
|
|
Given venue A has 99% fill rate
|
|
And venue B has 95% fill rate
|
|
When I submit an order without specific priority
|
|
Then the order should be routed to venue A
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 6. Rate Limiting Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 6.1: Global Rate Limiting
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Global Rate Limiting
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to enforce global rate limits
|
|
So that the system is not overwhelmed
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Exceed global rate limit
|
|
Given the global rate limit is 100 orders per second
|
|
When 150 orders are submitted in one second
|
|
Then the first 100 orders should be accepted
|
|
And the remaining 50 orders should be rejected
|
|
And the system should return a "rate limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Recover from rate limit
|
|
Given the global rate limit is 100 orders per second
|
|
And 100 orders were submitted in the previous second
|
|
When 50 orders are submitted in the current second
|
|
Then all 50 orders should be accepted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 6.2: Per-User Rate Limiting
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Per-User Rate Limiting
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to enforce per-user rate limits
|
|
So that no single user can overwhelm the system
|
|
|
|
Scenario: User exceeds personal rate limit
|
|
Given user A has a rate limit of 10 orders per second
|
|
When user A submits 15 orders in one second
|
|
Then the first 10 orders should be accepted
|
|
And the remaining 5 orders should be rejected
|
|
And user A should receive a "personal rate limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Multiple users within limits
|
|
Given user A has a rate limit of 10 orders per second
|
|
And user B has a rate limit of 10 orders per second
|
|
When user A submits 10 orders and user B submits 10 orders in the same second
|
|
Then all 20 orders should be accepted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 7. Value Limiting Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 7.1: Order Value Limits
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Order Value Limits
|
|
As a risk manager
|
|
I want to enforce order value limits
|
|
So that no single order can cause excessive loss
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Order exceeds value limit
|
|
Given the maximum order value is $100,000
|
|
And ES is trading at $4200 per contract
|
|
When a trader submits an order for 30 ES contracts ($126,000)
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "order value limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Order within value limit
|
|
Given the maximum order value is $100,000
|
|
And ES is trading at $4200 per contract
|
|
When a trader submits an order for 20 ES contracts ($84,000)
|
|
Then the order should be accepted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 7.2: Daily Value Limits
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Daily Value Limits
|
|
As a risk manager
|
|
I want to enforce daily value limits
|
|
So that traders cannot exceed daily exposure limits
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader exceeds daily value limit
|
|
Given the daily value limit is $500,000
|
|
And the trader has already executed $450,000 in orders today
|
|
When the trader submits an order for $100,000
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "daily value limit exceeded" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Trader approaches daily value limit
|
|
Given the daily value limit is $500,000
|
|
And the trader has already executed $450,000 in orders today
|
|
When the trader submits an order for $75,000
|
|
Then the order should be rejected
|
|
And the trader should receive a "approaching daily value limit" warning
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 8. Circuit Breaker Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 8.1: Circuit Breaker Activation
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Circuit Breaker Activation
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want the circuit breaker to activate during failures
|
|
So that the system can recover gracefully
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Circuit breaker opens after failures
|
|
Given the failure threshold is 5 failures
|
|
When 5 consecutive order failures occur
|
|
Then the circuit breaker should open
|
|
And new orders should be rejected
|
|
And the system should return a "circuit breaker open" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Circuit breaker closes after timeout
|
|
Given the circuit breaker is open
|
|
And the timeout period is 60 seconds
|
|
When 60 seconds have passed
|
|
And a test order succeeds
|
|
Then the circuit breaker should close
|
|
And new orders should be accepted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 8.2: Manual Circuit Breaker Control
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Manual Circuit Breaker Control
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to manually control the circuit breaker
|
|
So that I can respond to emergencies
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Administrator manually opens circuit breaker
|
|
Given the circuit breaker is closed
|
|
When an administrator manually opens the circuit breaker
|
|
Then all new orders should be rejected
|
|
And the system should return a "circuit breaker manually opened" error
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Administrator manually closes circuit breaker
|
|
Given the circuit breaker is open
|
|
When an administrator manually closes the circuit breaker
|
|
Then new orders should be accepted
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Performance Validation
|
|
|
|
### Load Testing Scenarios
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Load Testing
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to validate system performance under load
|
|
So that I can ensure system reliability
|
|
|
|
Scenario: System handles peak load
|
|
Given the system is configured for 1000 concurrent users
|
|
When 1000 users each submit 10 orders per second
|
|
Then the system should handle 10,000 orders per second
|
|
And response time should be under 100ms for 95% of orders
|
|
And no orders should be lost
|
|
|
|
Scenario: System handles burst load
|
|
Given the system is configured for 1000 concurrent users
|
|
When 1000 users each submit 100 orders in 1 second
|
|
Then the system should handle the burst without crashing
|
|
And orders should be queued and processed within 5 seconds
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Stress Testing Scenarios
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Stress Testing
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to validate system behavior under extreme conditions
|
|
So that I can ensure system stability
|
|
|
|
Scenario: System handles resource exhaustion
|
|
Given the system is under heavy load
|
|
When memory usage reaches 95%
|
|
Then the system should continue operating
|
|
And begin rejecting new orders gracefully
|
|
And alert administrators of the condition
|
|
|
|
Scenario: System handles network partition
|
|
Given the system experiences network partition
|
|
When connectivity to execution venues is lost
|
|
Then the system should queue orders locally
|
|
And resume processing when connectivity is restored
|
|
And notify administrators of the event
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Security Validation
|
|
|
|
### Authentication Scenarios
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Authentication
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to ensure only authorized users can access the system
|
|
So that system security is maintained
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Valid user authentication
|
|
Given a user with valid credentials
|
|
When the user attempts to authenticate
|
|
Then authentication should succeed
|
|
And the user should gain access to the system
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Invalid user authentication
|
|
Given a user with invalid credentials
|
|
When the user attempts to authenticate
|
|
Then authentication should fail
|
|
And the user should be denied access
|
|
And the attempt should be logged
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Authorization Scenarios
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: Authorization
|
|
As a system administrator
|
|
I want to ensure users can only perform authorized actions
|
|
So that system integrity is maintained
|
|
|
|
Scenario: User performs authorized action
|
|
Given a user with trader permissions
|
|
When the user submits a valid order
|
|
Then the action should be allowed
|
|
And the order should be processed
|
|
|
|
Scenario: User performs unauthorized action
|
|
Given a user with viewer permissions
|
|
When the user attempts to submit an order
|
|
Then the action should be denied
|
|
And the attempt should be logged
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Usability Validation
|
|
|
|
### User Interface Scenarios
|
|
```gherkin
|
|
Feature: User Interface
|
|
As a trader
|
|
I want an intuitive user interface
|
|
So that I can trade efficiently
|
|
|
|
Scenario: User submits order through UI
|
|
Given a trader is using the web interface
|
|
When the trader fills out the order form and clicks submit
|
|
Then the order should be submitted successfully
|
|
And the trader should receive confirmation
|
|
|
|
Scenario: User views order status through UI
|
|
Given a trader has submitted an order
|
|
When the trader views the order status page
|
|
Then the current order status should be displayed
|
|
And the information should be up to date
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Validation Execution Plan
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Unit Testing (Week 1-2)
|
|
- Execute all unit tests for individual components
|
|
- Achieve >95% code coverage for critical components
|
|
- Document and fix any failing tests
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Integration Testing (Week 3)
|
|
- Test interactions between components
|
|
- Validate data flow between modules
|
|
- Test error handling and recovery
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: System Testing (Week 4)
|
|
- Execute end-to-end scenarios
|
|
- Validate all functional requirements
|
|
- Test non-functional requirements (performance, security, usability)
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Performance Testing (Week 5)
|
|
- Execute load testing scenarios
|
|
- Validate system performance under expected load
|
|
- Identify and resolve bottlenecks
|
|
|
|
### Phase 5: User Acceptance Testing (Week 6)
|
|
- Conduct user acceptance testing with traders
|
|
- Gather feedback on usability and functionality
|
|
- Address any issues identified
|
|
|
|
### Phase 6: Production Validation (Week 7)
|
|
- Deploy to production environment
|
|
- Monitor system performance and stability
|
|
- Validate production readiness
|
|
|
|
## Validation Metrics
|
|
|
|
### Success Criteria
|
|
1. **Functional Coverage**: 100% of functional requirements validated
|
|
2. **Code Coverage**: >95% code coverage for critical components
|
|
3. **Performance**: System handles expected load with <100ms response time for 95% of requests
|
|
4. **Reliability**: System uptime >99.9%
|
|
5. **Security**: No critical security vulnerabilities identified
|
|
6. **Usability**: User satisfaction rating >4.0/5.0
|
|
|
|
### Key Performance Indicators
|
|
1. **Order Submission Rate**: Orders per second processed
|
|
2. **Order Fill Rate**: Percentage of orders successfully filled
|
|
3. **Average Response Time**: Time from order submission to acknowledgment
|
|
4. **Error Rate**: Percentage of failed orders
|
|
5. **System Availability**: Percentage of time system is operational
|
|
6. **User Satisfaction**: Trader feedback on system usability
|
|
|
|
## Risk Mitigation
|
|
|
|
### Identified Risks
|
|
1. **Performance Bottlenecks**: System may not meet performance requirements
|
|
- **Mitigation**: Conduct thorough performance testing and optimization
|
|
|
|
2. **Integration Failures**: Components may not integrate properly
|
|
- **Mitigation**: Implement comprehensive integration testing
|
|
|
|
3. **Security Vulnerabilities**: System may have security weaknesses
|
|
- **Mitigation**: Conduct security audits and penetration testing
|
|
|
|
4. **User Adoption**: Traders may resist adopting new system
|
|
- **Mitigation**: Involve users in design and conduct usability testing
|
|
|
|
### Contingency Plans
|
|
1. **Performance Issues**: Scale horizontally or optimize critical paths
|
|
2. **Integration Problems**: Implement fallback mechanisms or rollback plans
|
|
3. **Security Breaches**: Isolate affected components and implement patches
|
|
4. **User Resistance**: Provide additional training and support
|
|
|
|
## Validation Deliverables
|
|
|
|
### Documentation
|
|
1. **Test Plans**: Detailed test plans for each validation phase
|
|
2. **Test Cases**: Executable test cases covering all scenarios
|
|
3. **Test Results**: Comprehensive test results with analysis
|
|
4. **Defect Reports**: Detailed defect reports with resolution status
|
|
5. **Validation Report**: Final validation report summarizing results
|
|
|
|
### Tools and Artifacts
|
|
1. **Automated Tests**: Automated test suites for regression testing
|
|
2. **Performance Tests**: Performance test scripts and results
|
|
3. **Monitoring Dashboards**: Dashboards for real-time system monitoring
|
|
4. **Alerting Systems**: Automated alerting for system issues
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
This comprehensive validation plan ensures that the OMS implementation is thoroughly tested and validated before deployment to production. The plan covers all functional and non-functional requirements, with specific scenarios for each major component of the system.
|
|
|
|
The validation will be executed in phases, starting with unit testing and progressing through integration, system, performance, and user acceptance testing. Success criteria are clearly defined, and risks are identified with mitigation strategies.
|
|
|
|
Regular monitoring and reporting will ensure that any issues are identified and addressed promptly, resulting in a reliable and robust OMS that meets all stakeholder requirements.
|